Hyderabad drunk men attack : In a disturbing incident in Hyderabad, a group of intoxicated individuals assaulted a man and vandalized his property after he requested them to stop creating a disturbance. The incident occurred in the Netajinagar colony of Saroornagar on a Thursday night, highlighting the dangers of confronting unruly behavior.
Hyderabad: Group of Drunk Men Thrash Man Who Asked Them to Stop Creating Ruckus
The Incident
According to the police, a group of people were consuming liquor in an open area within the Netajinagar colony. Their loud and unruly behavior was causing a disturbance to the local residents. Janardhan Naidu, a resident of the colony, approached the group and politely asked them to leave, as their actions were causing a nuisance. He also took pictures of the group as a precautionary measure and then returned to his home.
This request, however, was not taken kindly by the group. Enraged by Naidu’s interference, they followed him back to his house. Upon reaching his property, they began to damage the window panes and other parts of the building. When Naidu came out to inspect the damage, the situation escalated violently.
ALSO READ : Angry Husband’s High-Risk Stunt: Climbs High-Tension Tower in Hyderabad
The Assault
The group, armed with sticks and stones, attacked Naidu, causing serious bleeding injuries. The police were called to the scene, and Naidu was taken to a nearby hospital for treatment. The severity of his injuries highlighted the brutality of the attack.
Police Action
The Saroornagar police swiftly responded to the incident. They registered a case under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) including:
- Section 143 (Unlawful Assembly)
- Section 147 (Rioting)
- Section 307 (Attempt to Murder)
- Section 452 (House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint)
- Section 506 (Criminal Intimidation)
- Section 149 (Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offense committed in prosecution of common object)
The police arrested Madi Shankhu (25), Gaddearaju Vamshi (26), C Harish (23), Shaheed Ali Khan (23), Mohammed Sonu (19), and two juveniles. All the accused were remanded to custody.
Community Reaction
The incident has sparked outrage among the residents of Netajinagar colony. Many expressed their concerns about the increasing incidents of public drunkenness and the resulting disturbances. They are calling for stricter enforcement of laws against public drinking and unruly behavior.
Local community leaders have also come forward, urging the police to increase patrolling in residential areas, especially during late hours, to prevent such incidents. They are also advocating for community awareness programs to educate people about the legal consequences of such behavior.
Conclusion :
This incident is a stark reminder of the potential dangers faced by individuals who stand up against unruly behavior in their communities. While it is important to add :ress such issues, it is equally crucial to ensure one’s safety. The swift action by the Saroornagar police is commendable, but the incident underscores the need for more proactive measures to prevent such occurrences in the future.
In conclusion, while confronting public nuisances is important, community members should also consider involving local authorities early to avoid escalation. This unfortunate event serves as a call to action for better community safety measures and stricter law enforcement.
ALSO READ : Exposed: Shocking Online Dating Scam in Hyderabad – 7 Arrested!
FAQs: Hyderabad Incident – Group of Drunk Men Assault
1. What happened in the incident at Netajinagar colony in Saroornagar?
- On Thursday night, a group of individuals consuming alcohol in an open space at Netajinagar colony were confronted by a man who asked them to stop creating a disturbance.
2. Why did the man ask the group to stop creating a ruckus?
- The man requested the group to stop creating a nuisance because their behavior was disturbing the residents of the area.
3. What was the group’s reaction when asked to stop?
- The group did not take the request well. Instead, they went to the man’s house and damaged the window panes of the building.
4. How did the man respond to the damage to his property?
- Janardhan Naidu, the owner of the house, went to inspect the damage caused by the group.
5. What happened when Janardhan Naidu went to inspect the damage?
- The group attacked Janardhan Naidu with sticks and stones, causing bleeding injuries.
6. What action did the police take following the incident?
- The police registered a case under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and apprehended seven individuals, including two juveniles.
7. Which sections of the IPC were the accused charged under?
- The accused were charged under Sections 143 (unlawful assembly), 147 (rioting), 307 (attempt to murder), 452 (house trespass), and 506 (criminal intimidation) read with 149 (every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offense committed in prosecution of common object) of the IPC.
8. How many individuals were apprehended by the police?
- The police apprehended seven individuals in connection with the incident.
9. Were any juveniles involved in the incident?
- Yes, two juveniles were among those apprehended by the police.
10. What are the names of the adults apprehended by the police?
- The adults apprehended are Madi Shankhu (25), Gaddearaju Vamshi (26), C Harish (23), Shaheed Ali Khan (23), and Mohammed Sonu (19).
11. What was the motive behind the attack on Janardhan Naidu?
- The attack was in retaliation to Janardhan Naidu asking the group to stop creating a disturbance and taking their pictures.
12. What injuries did Janardhan Naidu sustain in the attack?
- Janardhan Naidu sustained bleeding injuries from being attacked with sticks and stones.
13. Where did the incident take place?
- The incident took place at Netajinagar colony in Saroornagar, Hyderabad.
14. What was the group doing when they were approached by Janardhan Naidu?
- The group was consuming liquor in an open place.
15. Did the police take immediate action after the incident?
- Yes, the police took immediate action by registering a case and apprehending the individuals involved.
16. Are the apprehended individuals currently in police custody?
- Yes, all of the apprehended individuals have been remanded.
17. What is the significance of Section 307 in this case?
- Section 307 of the IPC pertains to the attempt to murder, indicating the seriousness of the attack on Janardhan Naidu.
18. Did Janardhan Naidu take any photographs of the group?
- Yes, Janardhan Naidu took pictures of the group before leaving the place.
19. How did the police classify the assembly of the group?
- The police classified the assembly of the group as unlawful under Section 143 of the IPC.
20. What message does this incident convey about public disturbances?
- The incident highlights the importance of addressing public disturbances and the potential consequences of retaliatory violence.
