Conviction of Pradeep Sharma : Unraveling a 2006 Fake Encounter Case

Conviction of Pradeep Sharma : Unraveling a 2006 Fake Encounter Case

Conviction of Pradeep Sharma : In a significant turn of events that has riveted the nation, the Bombay High Court sentenced former Mumbai police officer Pradeep Sharma to life imprisonment for his involvement in the 2006 fake encounter killing of Ramnarayan Gupta, also known as Lakhan Bhaiya. This judgement not only overturns Sharma’s previous acquittal by a lower court but also casts a long shadow over the Mumbai Police’s encounter history, raising questions about justice, law enforcement practices, and human rights.

Conviction of Pradeep Sharma : Unraveling a 2006 Fake Encounter Case

Conviction of Pradeep Sharma : Unraveling a 2006 Fake Encounter Case
Conviction of Pradeep Sharma : Unraveling a 2006 Fake Encounter Case

The case dates back to November 11, 2006, when Lakhan Bhaiya, an alleged member of the Chhota Rajan gang, was reportedly killed in a fake encounter near Nana Nani Park in Versova. The incident, initially painted as a genuine encounter by the police, came under scrutiny, leading to a protracted legal battle that culminated in this landmark judgment by the Bombay High Court.

Pradeep Sharma, hailed as an “encounter specialist” with numerous encounters under his belt, was acquitted in 2013, only to be convicted in a dramatic reversal by the High Court in 2024. The court’s scathing indictment of the police’s actions as an “abuse of power” and a “misuse of their position” underscores the grave concerns regarding custodial deaths and fake encounters.

FAQs: Conviction of Pradeep Sharma

  1. Who is Pradeep Sharma?
    • Pradeep Sharma is a former Mumbai Police officer, notorious as an “encounter specialist” for his involvement in numerous police encounters.
  2. What triggered the Bombay High Court’s decision?
    • The decision came after overturning Sharma’s 2013 acquittal, due to the overwhelming evidence proving the encounter was staged.
  3. Who was Lakhan Bhaiya?
    • Lakhan Bhaiya, real name Ramnarayan Gupta, was an alleged member of the Chhota Rajan gang, purportedly killed in a fake police encounter in 2006.
  4. What was the nature of the encounter?
    • The encounter was falsely presented as a legitimate police operation but was later proven to be premeditated murder.
  5. How did the court view the trial court’s acquittal of Sharma?
    • The High Court deemed the trial court’s acquittal as “perverse and unsustainable,” leading to Sharma’s conviction.
  6. What were the charges against Sharma and others?
    • Sharma and others were convicted of murder and conspiracy, among other charges, related to the fake encounter.
  7. How many others were convicted in this case?
    • Alongside Sharma, 12 other policemen and one civilian were convicted for their roles in the encounter.
  8. Did anyone get acquitted?
    • Yes, six individuals were acquitted due to insufficient evidence against them.
  9. What does this case reveal about police encounters?
    • It highlights the grim reality of staged encounters and the misuse of power within the police force.
  10. What was the public reaction to Sharma’s conviction?
    • The conviction has been met with mixed reactions, with some seeing it as a step towards justice, while others express concern over the implications for police morale.
  11. What precedent does this case set?
    • It sets a significant legal precedent emphasizing accountability and transparency in law enforcement operations.
  12. How has the Mumbai Police responded?
    • The Mumbai Police has not publicly commented on the conviction, reflecting the delicate nature of the case.
  13. Are fake encounters a common issue in India?
    • While not widespread, there have been notable instances of fake encounters, raising concerns over police practices.
  14. What does this mean for encounter specialists?
    • This conviction could lead to increased scrutiny and reevaluation of the role of encounter specialists within the police force.
  15. How does this affect the families involved?
    • For Lakhan Bhaiya’s family, the verdict brings a sense of closure, while Sharma’s family faces the challenge of navigating his imprisonment.
  16. What legal options are available to Sharma now?
    • Sharma can appeal the High Court’s decision in the Supreme Court of India.
  17. What were the key pieces of evidence against Sharma?
    • Witness testimonies, ballistic evidence, and inconsistencies in the police narrative were crucial to the conviction.
  18. How has this case impacted the legal system?
    • It underscores the importance of judicial oversight in preventing and punishing misuse of power by law enforcement.
  19. What lessons can be learned from this case?
    • The case highlights the need for reforms to ensure police operations are conducted ethically and legally.
  20. What future implications does this case have?
    • It may lead to more stringent regulations and oversight regarding police encounters and the use of lethal force.

ALSO READ : Rameshwaram Cafe blast Bengaluru : 4 detained – Delhi Police on alert


The conviction of Pradeep Sharma not only closes a dark chapter in Mumbai’s law enforcement history but also opens a dialogue on the ethical responsibilities of police officers. It serves as a reminder that justice, though sometimes delayed, is inevitable, and the law’s long arm will eventually uphold the truth.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Teekha Samachar

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading